From f989c41e890e57f37d535a5423c8ae74f7742b64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benjamin Paassen <bpaassen@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 16:53:13 +0100
Subject: added a mid-term TODO. Cardinality handling might be improvable.

---
 src/core/model/Domain.hpp | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'src/core')

diff --git a/src/core/model/Domain.hpp b/src/core/model/Domain.hpp
index d1ba44f..16d1f8f 100644
--- a/src/core/model/Domain.hpp
+++ b/src/core/model/Domain.hpp
@@ -467,7 +467,11 @@ public:
 	std::vector<Rooted<Node>> pathTo(
 	    Handle<StructuredClass> childDescriptor) const;
 };
-
+/*
+ * TODO: We should discuss Cardinalities one more time. Is it smart to define
+ * cardinalities independent of context? Should we not have at least have the
+ * possibility to define it context-dependently?
+ */
 typedef RangeSet<size_t> Cardinality;
 
 /**
-- 
cgit v1.2.3