From 76ab539306d98dfedb759731f6ea3808d3f5f9c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Paassen Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:28:45 +0100 Subject: consistent nomenclature for reference concepts. --- testdata/xmlparser/book_domain.oxm | 16 ++++++++-------- testdata/xmlparser/comments_domain.oxm | 18 +++++++++--------- testdata/xmlparser/headings_domain.oxm | 22 +++++++++++----------- 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) (limited to 'testdata') diff --git a/testdata/xmlparser/book_domain.oxm b/testdata/xmlparser/book_domain.oxm index 8b46460..c86d4e3 100644 --- a/testdata/xmlparser/book_domain.oxm +++ b/testdata/xmlparser/book_domain.oxm @@ -33,11 +33,11 @@ effectively use forward declarations here. So the resolve() process may only be started _after_ all delcarations are read. --> - + - + @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ - - + + @@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ - - + + @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ - + @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ - + diff --git a/testdata/xmlparser/comments_domain.oxm b/testdata/xmlparser/comments_domain.oxm index 1336b47..2a3ad59 100644 --- a/testdata/xmlparser/comments_domain.oxm +++ b/testdata/xmlparser/comments_domain.oxm @@ -5,10 +5,10 @@ - + - + @@ -18,23 +18,23 @@ two fields in comment and reply? Could we use a fieldRef here? Or would that be circular? --> - + - + - - - + + + - + - + diff --git a/testdata/xmlparser/headings_domain.oxm b/testdata/xmlparser/headings_domain.oxm index 2238792..d421747 100644 --- a/testdata/xmlparser/headings_domain.oxm +++ b/testdata/xmlparser/headings_domain.oxm @@ -8,26 +8,26 @@ that parent-child-relationship in this sense are mediated by fields. So we must either reference a field that is already there or declare a new one on the fly. --> - + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - + - + -- cgit v1.2.3